Title

RLPROMPT: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts With Reinforcement Learning

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

arXiv

Abstract

Prompting has shown impressive success in enabling large pretrained language models (LMs) to perform diverse NLP tasks, especially when only few downstream data are available. Automatically finding the optimal prompt for each task, however, is challenging. Most existing work resorts to tuning soft prompt (e.g., embeddings) which falls short of interpretability, reusability across LMs, and applicability when gradients are not accessible. Discrete prompt, on the other hand, is difficult to optimize, and is often created by "enumeration (e.g., paraphrasing)-then-selection" heuristics that do not explore the prompt space systematically. This paper proposes RLPROMPT, an efficient discrete prompt optimization approach with reinforcement learning (RL). RLPROMPT formulates a parameter-efficient policy network that generates the desired discrete prompt after training with reward. To overcome the complexity and stochasticity of reward signals by the large LM environment, we incorporate effective reward stabilization that substantially enhances the training efficiency. RLPROMPT is flexibly applicable to different types of LMs, such as masked (e.g., BERT) and left-to-right models (e.g., GPTs), for both classification and generation tasks. Experiments on few-shot classification and unsupervised text style transfer show superior performance over a wide range of existing finetuning or prompting methods. Interestingly, the resulting optimized prompts are often ungrammatical gibberish text; and surprisingly, those gibberish prompts are transferrable between different LMs to retain significant performance, indicating LM prompting may not follow human language patterns. Copyright © 2022, The Authors. All rights reserved.

DOI

10.48550/arXiv.2205.12548

Publication Date

5-25-2022

Keywords

Optimization, Reinforcement learning, Text processing, Down-stream, Embeddings, Interpretability, Language model, Modeling environments, Optimization approach, Performance, Policy networks, Reinforcement learnings, Stochasticity

Comments

IR Deposit conditions: non-described

Preprint available on arXiv

Share

COinS