How Good is Google Bard’s Visual Understanding? An Empirical Study on Open Challenges
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Machine Intelligence Research
Abstract
Google’s Bard has emerged as a formidable competitor to OpenAI’s ChatGPT in the field of conversational AI. Notably, Bard has recently been updated to handle visual inputs alongside text prompts during conversations. Given Bard’s impressive track record in handling textual inputs, we explore its capabilities in understanding and interpreting visual data (images) conditioned by text questions. This exploration holds the potential to unveil new insights and challenges for Bard and other forthcoming multi-modal Generative models, especially in addressing complex computer vision problems that demand accurate visual and language understanding. Specifically, in this study, we focus on 15 diverse task scenarios encompassing regular, camouflaged, medical, under-water and remote sensing data to comprehensively evaluate Bard’s performance. Our primary finding indicates that Bard still struggles in these vision scenarios, highlighting the significant gap in vision-based understanding that needs to be bridged in future developments. We expect that this empirical study will prove valuable in advancing future models, leading to enhanced capabilities in comprehending and interpreting fine-grained visual data. Our project is released on https://github.com/htqin/GoogleBard-VisUnderstand .
First Page
605
Last Page
613
DOI
10.1007/s11633-023-1469-x
Publication Date
8-30-2023
Keywords
chatbot, conversational AI, Google Bard, large language models, multi-modal understanding, visual comprehension
Recommended Citation
H. Qin, G.P. Ji, S. Khan, D.P. Fan, F.S. Khan and L.V. Gool, "How Good is Google Bard’s Visual Understanding? An Empirical Study on Open Challenges," Machine Intelligence Research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 605 - 613, Aug 2023. doi:10.1007/s11633-023-1469-x
Additional Links
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-023-1469-x
Comments
IR Deposit conditions:
OA version (pathway b) Accepted version
12 months embargo
License: Publisher's Bespoke License
Published source must be acknowledged with citation
Must link to publisher version with DOI
Post-prints are subject to Springer Nature re-use terms
Set statement to accompany deposit (see policy)